Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Hard drives not detected in repeatable order.
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:20:43
Message-Id: j6f4ju$lg5$1@dough.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Hard drives not detected in repeatable order. by Walter Dnes
1 On 2011-10-04, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote:
2 > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 12:03:47PM -0700, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote
3 >
4 >> They have the advantage over UUID's in that you can set them and
5 >> therefore can be human readable. Also, if you use a desktop
6 >> environment, they look nice in file managers.
7 >
8 > I assume that name clashes can be avoided by using hostname-label. My
9 > question is... are there any circumstances where you can use UUIDs but
10 > not labels, or visa versa? If so, I'd prefer to go with the more robust
11 > option from day 1, rather than switch later.
12
13 The only thing I came across was a mention that some filesystems (e.g.
14 VFAT) don't support labels. Though all the "good" ones appear to.
15
16 --
17 Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Is this TERMINAL fun?
18 at
19 gmail.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Hard drives not detected in repeatable order. "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>