Archives
Archives
| From: | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Hard drives not detected in repeatable order. | ||
| Date: | Tue, 04 Oct 2011 02:26:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20111004022532.GC3367@waltdnes.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Hard drives not detected in repeatable order. by "Canek Peláez Valdés" |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 12:03:47PM -0700, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > They have the advantage over UUID's in that you can set them and |
| 4 | > therefore can be human readable. Also, if you use a desktop |
| 5 | > environment, they look nice in file managers. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I assume that name clashes can be avoided by using hostname-label. My |
| 8 | question is... are there any circumstances where you can use UUIDs but |
| 9 | not labels, or visa versa? If so, I'd prefer to go with the more robust |
| 10 | option from day 1, rather than switch later. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Hard drives not detected in repeatable order. | "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Hard drives not detected in repeatable order. | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |
| [gentoo-user] Re: Hard drives not detected in repeatable order. | Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> |