| 1 |
On Thursday 12 Nov 2015 04:48:49 J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11 November 2015 23:07:41 CET, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> >On Wednesday 11 Nov 2015 20:28:07 Marc Joliet wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On Wednesday 11 November 2015 20:37:24 J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> >I saw plenty of errors with mysql. |
| 6 |
> >> > |
| 7 |
> >> >After switching to Postgresql, they seem to have disappeared. |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> FWIW, I use mariadb myself, which is also the virtual/mysql default |
| 10 |
> >> provider, last I checked. |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> Greetings |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> >@Mark: Yes, same here, but the errors are produced by mariadb too. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> >@Joost: Is postgresql starting as a process by akonadi, or are you |
| 17 |
> >running it |
| 18 |
> >independently and pointing akonadi to it? |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> >PS. I read somewhere that if mysql is running independently of akonadi, |
| 21 |
> >then |
| 22 |
> >the akonadi errors/corruptions are fewer, or not happen at all. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> As I use Postgresql also for other stuff, it's started seperately. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> I also found this performs better, having it run "embedded" only had a |
| 27 |
> slightly better performance when compared to mysql (or mariadb, don't |
| 28 |
> remember) "embedded". |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> A framework like akonadi should, IMO, also be able to be run on a server |
| 31 |
> with clients connecting to there to allow different machines to all use |
| 32 |
> the same data. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> The current solution makes running with a shared home and logged in from |
| 35 |
> different clients simultaneously problematic (to say the least) |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> -- |
| 38 |
> Joost |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Can you please explain how you have akonadi configured to use an existing db |
| 41 |
instance? Did you have to set up an akonadi db user and passwd? |
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
Regards, |
| 44 |
Mick |
Archives