1 |
Hilco Wijbenga wrote: |
2 |
> 2008/12/26 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Sorry to say but I'm back. I set up that filter and checked the spam |
5 |
>> bucket on webmail today. It had over 800 messages and some of them are |
6 |
>> not spam. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> This is not an answer to your question below but I wanted to mention a |
10 |
> few things that might help you (if you decide to stick with Gmail a |
11 |
> bit longer). |
12 |
> |
13 |
> When you see spam in your inbox do you use "Report spam"? When you see |
14 |
> valid email in your spam do you use "Not spam"? I found it learns very |
15 |
> quickly what I consider spam and what not. I also tend to go through |
16 |
> the spam folder whenever there's 10 or more messages there. That makes |
17 |
> it easy and fast and 99% of the time it's a simple select "All" + |
18 |
> "Delete forever". If you wait until there's 800 mails there you're |
19 |
> bound to make mistakes and it's a big job to clean it all up. |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
Well, I'm on dial-up and that thing doesn't like my slow as crap |
23 |
connection. Thanks AT&T for keeping your promise on getting use DSL. |
24 |
Bit of sarcasm there in case you can't tell. Very few things are on my |
25 |
crap list but they are one and close to the top. Anyway, using the |
26 |
webmail thing is a mess. It times oout part way through loading the |
27 |
page and all that crap. It took me a loong while to go through all that. |
28 |
|
29 |
What I thought of doing is checking all of them then telling google none |
30 |
of them is spam at all. Over time, it should not mark anything as |
31 |
spam. Of course, that will mess up other people as well. Sort of hate |
32 |
to do that but if it means I can get my emails, then it is a option. |
33 |
|
34 |
> |
35 |
>> Does anybody know of a way to disable this stupid thing? I'm |
36 |
>> about to switch email addresses if I can't do something with this |
37 |
>> thing. If you have no ideas on how to disable, what are some free email |
38 |
>> servers that allow pop access? |
39 |
>> |
40 |
> |
41 |
> No idea. |
42 |
> |
43 |
|
44 |
Me either. |
45 |
|
46 |
> |
47 |
>> I always liked Google but this sort of pisses me off. No wonder people |
48 |
>> say they sent me a card or something and I never got it. They are in |
49 |
>> the spam bucket. Thought about marking them ALL as "not spam" and just |
50 |
>> screwing their spam filter right up. Sort of a get even thing there. :-@ |
51 |
>> |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Well, Don Quixote, I hope you'll forgive me for putting my money on |
54 |
> Google anyway. ;-) :-P If you do decide to take on Google |
55 |
> single-handedly ... keep a blog please, it should make for hilarious |
56 |
> reading. ;-) :-) |
57 |
> |
58 |
> Cheers, |
59 |
> Hilco |
60 |
> |
61 |
> |
62 |
> |
63 |
|
64 |
Well, even if I did, I would be switched by then. If I'm not getting |
65 |
the service I pay for or expect, I move on. I may be switching ISPs |
66 |
again before long too. I like to get online when I need to not when |
67 |
they think I should. I also plan to keep my OS up to date even if it |
68 |
means a 10 hour download. If they can't handle that, I'll find someone |
69 |
who can. Already found my new ISP just waiting for word from my current |
70 |
one. They claim it is unlimited but then put limits on it. Funny huh? |
71 |
|
72 |
Who's Don? I never heard of him. |
73 |
|
74 |
Dale |
75 |
|
76 |
:-) :-) |