1 |
2008/12/26 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>: |
2 |
> Hilco Wijbenga wrote: |
3 |
>> 2008/12/26 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>: |
4 |
<snip/> |
5 |
> Well, I'm on dial-up and that thing doesn't like my slow as crap |
6 |
> connection. Thanks AT&T for keeping your promise on getting use DSL. |
7 |
> Bit of sarcasm there in case you can't tell. Very few things are on my |
8 |
> crap list but they are one and close to the top. Anyway, using the |
9 |
> webmail thing is a mess. It times oout part way through loading the |
10 |
> page and all that crap. It took me a loong while to go through all that. |
11 |
|
12 |
Yeah, that definitely sucks. Nowadays a lot of webapps expect you to |
13 |
have your own private T3. :-) I'm not sure whether Yahoo will be much |
14 |
better though... |
15 |
|
16 |
> What I thought of doing is checking all of them then telling google none |
17 |
> of them is spam at all. Over time, it should not mark anything as |
18 |
> spam. Of course, that will mess up other people as well. Sort of hate |
19 |
> to do that but if it means I can get my emails, then it is a option. |
20 |
|
21 |
I'm not really clear on how personalised it is. Not everyone agrees |
22 |
(all the time) on what is spam and what is not. It seems that it is |
23 |
somehow able to apply my personal settings to the spam filter. |
24 |
|
25 |
<snip/> |
26 |
>>> I always liked Google but this sort of pisses me off. No wonder people |
27 |
>>> say they sent me a card or something and I never got it. They are in |
28 |
>>> the spam bucket. Thought about marking them ALL as "not spam" and just |
29 |
>>> screwing their spam filter right up. Sort of a get even thing there. :-@ |
30 |
>>> |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> Well, Don Quixote, I hope you'll forgive me for putting my money on |
33 |
>> Google anyway. ;-) :-P If you do decide to take on Google |
34 |
>> single-handedly ... keep a blog please, it should make for hilarious |
35 |
>> reading. ;-) :-) |
36 |
>> |
37 |
>> Cheers, |
38 |
>> Hilco |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Well, even if I did, I would be switched by then. If I'm not getting |
41 |
> the service I pay for or expect, I move on. I may be switching ISPs |
42 |
> again before long too. I like to get online when I need to not when |
43 |
> they think I should. I also plan to keep my OS up to date even if it |
44 |
> means a 10 hour download. If they can't handle that, I'll find someone |
45 |
> who can. Already found my new ISP just waiting for word from my current |
46 |
> one. They claim it is unlimited but then put limits on it. Funny huh? |
47 |
|
48 |
Perhaps they meant the wait is unlimited? ;-) |
49 |
|
50 |
> Who's Don? I never heard of him. |
51 |
|
52 |
I see no smiley, so I'll assume you're serious: |
53 |
|
54 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Quixote |
55 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tilting_at_windmills |
56 |
|
57 |
Cheers, |
58 |
Hilco |