Archives
Archives
| From: | Ignas Anikevicius <anikevicius@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Suspend to {RAM,Disk] | ||
| Date: | Fri, 18 May 2012 21:45:07 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4FB6C263.6000800@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Suspend to {RAM,Disk] (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in background) by Alex Schuster |
||
| 1 | On 18/05/12 20:59, Alex Schuster wrote: |
| 2 | > Suspend to ram (using the hibernate-ram command from |
| 3 | > sys-power/hibernate-script) seems to work better. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | What about pm-utils? Does it work better or worse than hibernate-script. |
| 6 | I had 0 problems with it during entire usage of linux, whereas with the |
| 7 | hibernate script package I had some issues... |
| 8 | |
| 9 | And yes, I am usually suspending to ram, but I was just thinking about |
| 10 | possibilities to make my computer boot faster in the cases I really need |
| 11 | to do a restart. :) |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Cheers, |
| 14 | Ignas |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Suspend to {RAM,Disk] | Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Suspend to {RAM,Disk] | Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> |