1 |
On 03/28/2017 01:19 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: |
2 |
> The point is: I connected the computers to the lan ports of my |
3 |
> secondary router (with original firmware, but I intended to install |
4 |
> ddwrt), and the setup works, except that the speed never reaches |
5 |
> 100Mbps. |
6 |
|
7 |
This is not unusual, the speeds they advertise are device to device |
8 |
(i.e. switched, not routed.) |
9 |
|
10 |
> |
11 |
> Which part is to blame? The secondary router boasts 1300Mbps on 5GHz |
12 |
> WiFi, so I assumed it could deal with 150Mbps on cat5e ethernet cable. |
13 |
> The power consumption is about 4.5w, which seems a bit flimsy. |
14 |
> Or maybe the primary router is thottling speed when in bridge mode? Is |
15 |
> this possible at all? (And if so, what could be the purpose of such |
16 |
> measure? *spooky*) |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
As Mick mentioned, a lot of the all-in-ones don't have enough CPU |
20 |
available to route at those speeds. Some of them do come with hardware |
21 |
offloading, thus taking it off the main CPU but that itself doesn't mean |
22 |
it is able to route at port speed. |
23 |
|
24 |
I have the same problem, I had an old RT-N16. It finally crapped out and |
25 |
have read many stories about these $200 all-in-ones that can't actually |
26 |
fully route at 100 mbit+ speeds. Some of the newer hardware revisions |
27 |
can with hardware offloading. |
28 |
|
29 |
For myself, as fibre is coming to my home sometime this year (I'm |
30 |
looking forward to symmetrical 150mbit at $85/month) I'm probably going |
31 |
to get an Ubiquiti Edgerouter and AP, and perhaps even a small managed |
32 |
switch. The middle grade Edgerouters have been tested to actually route |
33 |
at near gigabit speeds. |
34 |
|
35 |
The problem with my solution is cost, it'll probably be 2-3x higher than |
36 |
the high-end all-in-ones. But at least if a component fails or gets |
37 |
outdated, I can replace one thing at a time. Thinking mainly wifi |
38 |
technologies changing. |
39 |
|
40 |
Dan |