| 1 |
On 05/03/2012 02:48 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:18 PM, walt <w41ter@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 04/13/2012 05:19 PM, walt wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> A recent update |
| 6 |
>>> (udev?) on my ~amd64 machines is now mounting removable drives |
| 7 |
>>> on /run/media instead of /media. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Ha! I should have suspected Lennart from the beginning: |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=231931ffba1bca9d8759bbd6f797e56f8c6971fa |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> The link you posted has nothing to do with this; that's only a |
| 15 |
> systemd-specific change in response to a change in udisks2. In other |
| 16 |
> words, Lennart has nothing to do with this change, the responsible is |
| 17 |
> David Zeuthen, udisks2 maintainer: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/110773474140772402317/posts/NqPUifsFUYH |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Thanks for the correction. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> And it's actually a pretty reasonable change (IMHO): now in multiseat |
| 24 |
> configurations each user can plug a USB drive and only him/she will |
| 25 |
> see it |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I've thought that for a long time. Mounting my own "personal mount" on |
| 28 |
a system directory never made any sense to me. However, /run/media is |
| 29 |
still a system directory, so it still doesn't make any sense to me. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I think /home/wa1ter/media is a more logical choice. But I'm not doing |
| 32 |
the coding in this bazaar ;) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
The upstream dev(s) seem intent on mounting removable media on a tempfs |
| 35 |
for some reason. Do you know why? |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I understand completely the reason for inventing /run and making it a |
| 38 |
tempfs (I think Lennart *was* involved in that), but why use /run when |
| 39 |
it's not necessary or (IMHO) logical? |
Archives