1 |
On Friday 19 November 2010 23:14:01 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 11:06 on Friday 19 November 2010, Mick did |
3 |
> |
4 |
> opine thusly: |
5 |
> > So it seems that I should delete efl, install enlightenment overlay |
6 |
> > instead, remove any package.keywords on all 9999 ** packages (?) that I |
7 |
> > had set up for efl and instead unmask beta versions of packages as |
8 |
> > portage is telling me to do. Have I got this right, or should I leave |
9 |
> > 9999 ** in my package keywords for the enlightenment packages? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > I may wait until Sunday or so in the hope that all this dust has settled, |
12 |
> > because I fear that I may be caught half-way between changes on efl and |
13 |
> > enlightenment overlays with no way of installing a working desktop. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Thanks again for holding my hand on this. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> It just got even more interesting. The EFL libs (but not the window |
18 |
> manager) just got committed to the portage tree. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> The version is 1.0.0_beta2 and the devs have stated they intend no more |
21 |
> API/ABI breakages. So I'm tempted to say we should install the beta libs so |
22 |
> we don't have to constantly upgrade the whole lot. |
23 |
|
24 |
Excellent! |
25 |
|
26 |
It's getting late over here, so I'll get on with this tomorrow. -_- |
27 |
|
28 |
For x11-wm/enlightenment I'll have to keep 9999 ** in keywords, but switch |
29 |
overlay to 'enlightenment'. |
30 |
|
31 |
Is the efl overlay going to be taken offline in the future? |
32 |
|
33 |
PS. I'm impressed, but where do you go to find all this info about |
34 |
enlightenment & gentoo? |
35 |
-- |
36 |
Regards, |
37 |
Mick |