| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:06 on Friday 19 November 2010, Mick did |
| 2 |
opine thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> So it seems that I should delete efl, install enlightenment overlay |
| 6 |
> instead, remove any package.keywords on all 9999 ** packages (?) that I |
| 7 |
> had set up for efl and instead unmask beta versions of packages as portage |
| 8 |
> is telling me to do. Have I got this right, or should I leave 9999 ** in |
| 9 |
> my package keywords for the enlightenment packages? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I may wait until Sunday or so in the hope that all this dust has settled, |
| 12 |
> because I fear that I may be caught half-way between changes on efl and |
| 13 |
> enlightenment overlays with no way of installing a working desktop. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Thanks again for holding my hand on this. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
It just got even more interesting. The EFL libs (but not the window manager) |
| 18 |
just got committed to the portage tree. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The version is 1.0.0_beta2 and the devs have stated they intend no more |
| 21 |
API/ABI breakages. So I'm tempted to say we should install the beta libs so we |
| 22 |
don't have to constantly upgrade the whole lot. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives