Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kernel compilation
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:01:19
Message-Id: 200710171944.46785.alan@linuxholdings.co.za
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] kernel compilation by Dan Farrell
1 On Wednesday 17 October 2007, Dan Farrell wrote:
2 > > 1.) I want to build a kernel, which is nearly monolithic.
3 > > Everything, which can be build inside of kernel is built inside of
4 > > kernel.
5 >
6 > FYI, although this is somewhat popular and seen as a performance
7 > enhancement to many, it all it really ends up meaning that you have
8 > to reboot the computer to control the parameters of various parts of
9 > the kernel (kernel / module parameters are often equivelent).
10
11 And while many *see* it as a performance enhancement, in reality it is
12 little more than another ricer fantasy - on the same order as "-O9" in
13 your CFLAGS.
14
15 Kernel modules are essentially self-modifying code that plugs itself
16 into a running kernel to give the same code as if the module were
17 actually monolithic. Performance increase = zero.
18
19 alan
20
21 --
22 Optimists say the glass is half full,
23 Pessimists say the glass is half empty,
24 Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be?
25
26 Alan McKinnon
27 alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za
28 +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five
29 --
30 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: kernel compilation Marc Blumentritt <marc.blumentritt@×××××.de>