1 |
On Wednesday 17 October 2007, Dan Farrell wrote: |
2 |
> > 1.) I want to build a kernel, which is nearly monolithic. |
3 |
> > Everything, which can be build inside of kernel is built inside of |
4 |
> > kernel. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> FYI, although this is somewhat popular and seen as a performance |
7 |
> enhancement to many, it all it really ends up meaning that you have |
8 |
> to reboot the computer to control the parameters of various parts of |
9 |
> the kernel (kernel / module parameters are often equivelent). |
10 |
|
11 |
And while many *see* it as a performance enhancement, in reality it is |
12 |
little more than another ricer fantasy - on the same order as "-O9" in |
13 |
your CFLAGS. |
14 |
|
15 |
Kernel modules are essentially self-modifying code that plugs itself |
16 |
into a running kernel to give the same code as if the module were |
17 |
actually monolithic. Performance increase = zero. |
18 |
|
19 |
alan |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Optimists say the glass is half full, |
23 |
Pessimists say the glass is half empty, |
24 |
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? |
25 |
|
26 |
Alan McKinnon |
27 |
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za |
28 |
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five |
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |