1 |
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:19:21 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > Is systemd starting to encompass too much? I think so, but who cares? |
4 |
> > If we want an init manager that reads systemd-like files but doesn't |
5 |
> > do anything else (hostnamectl, logging, udev, etc.), I guess we'll |
6 |
> > have to make one. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> or trim it back. Conceptually, it shouldn't be too hard to remove those |
9 |
> extra services leaving only an init manager. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Reading posts over the years (I don't use systemd) most of that stuff |
12 |
> can be disabled by config in systemd anyway |
13 |
|
14 |
A lot of it is disabled by default anyway, you have to turn it on if you |
15 |
want to use it. Otherwise it's just there. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Neil Bothwick |
20 |
|
21 |
- We are but packets in the internet of Life- |