| 1 |
On 01/02/2012 04:58 PM, Michael Mol wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Ah. I must have gotten confused at "So which ones can I remove? |
| 4 |
> Solutions involving time travel and/or losing customers will be |
| 5 |
> disqualified." |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Sorry, this thread has gotten a little out of hand =) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I think my point was: most solutions available to me now involve |
| 11 |
potential breakage. Others require me to be more careful 6 years ago. |
| 12 |
Neither of those is desirable. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The current --update behavior makes this situation easy to get into. If |
| 15 |
there are no downsides to the old behavior (the point of this thread), |
| 16 |
then I think the old behavior is preferable. |
Archives