Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Al <oss.elmar@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Shared libraries in Gentoo
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:21:14
Message-Id: AANLkTimNPmn_E3qWoHoFv0P0Q-6uvFF_4W0N+PONfOhv@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Shared libraries in Gentoo by Alan McKinnon
1 > gentoo is run emerge, study output, understand all of it, consider what
2 > flameeyes has to say about it, wonder if some screw ball fucked up glibc yet
3 > again, discuss in upgrade meetings, then proceed with lots of other crap ad
4 > nauseam.
5
6 That's why a was talking of CentOs as fist step. Conservative,
7 unexperimental approach.
8
9 Then you have those guys, that deal with 130 different machines now.
10 Once uniformly, they could all do Gentoo debugging and patching. The
11 distro would instantly work as smooth you want it.
12
13 > It's 130 different configs on 150 machines serving 30 different systems, many
14 > of them legacy systems. Management once asked what it will take to unlegacy
15 > all of that. They didn't like my answer:
16 >
17 > Triple the salary budget
18 > Two years.
19
20 That's cheap. Isn't a factor of ten always more to the truth?
21
22 Al

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Shared libraries in Gentoo Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>