1 |
Tom Wijsman wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:25:18 -0400 |
3 |
> Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> I am on the list and don't need two copies. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent - or worst case, delete |
12 |
>> my direct email manually yourself) in your email program. |
13 |
> Like everyone else, use the 'Filter duplicates' function in your email |
14 |
> program or procmail; these requests aren't remembered, given that email |
15 |
> programs don't provide a function to do this selectively. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> For more insight: |
18 |
> |
19 |
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html |
20 |
> http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
So let's get this straight. You want most everyone on this list to |
25 |
change what they have to do to remove dups caused by you, instead of you |
26 |
changing what you do to fix the problem? To put it another way, you |
27 |
want to inconvenience everyone else instead of doing things the way |
28 |
everyone else does it and has done it for a long time? |
29 |
|
30 |
Here's a hint. I can see a LOT of people adding you to their |
31 |
blacklist. You could very well end up talking to yourself on this |
32 |
mailing list. Why not send messages in html while at it? That should |
33 |
finish off you getting your messages read. |
34 |
|
35 |
Just something to think about. |
36 |
|
37 |
Dale |
38 |
|
39 |
:-) :-) |
40 |
|
41 |
P. S. CC this message to me and I get a dup, I won't get the next one. |
42 |
I can fix the issue for you on a more permanent basis. |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |