| 1 |
On 2009-10-03, Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 2 Oct 2009, at 17:16, Grant Edwards wrote: |
| 4 |
>> ... |
| 5 |
>> I don't like nano much either -- I find it rather clumsy, but |
| 6 |
>> at least it seems to be "safe". It doesn't trash my file every |
| 7 |
>> 30 seconds when I start typing content while in command mode. |
| 8 |
>> Honestly -- I've used vi infrequently but regularly (probably |
| 9 |
>> several times a month) for decades, and my brain just doesn't |
| 10 |
>> work the way vi does. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> What editor do you prefer, then? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I'm an emacs guy. I've been using emacs (or various clones |
| 15 |
such as jove and jed) for 25 years now. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> IIRC when I was at uni (c 2000) one of the TA's suggested Joe |
| 18 |
> as an alternative to the traditional Unix editors. I have been |
| 19 |
> making a little effort in the last year or two to come to |
| 20 |
> grips with vi or vim, and am starting to prefer it, but ISTM |
| 21 |
> that the problem with traditional Unix editors (i.e. vi & |
| 22 |
> emacs) is that they depend upon learning obscure keyboard |
| 23 |
> shortcuts. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I don't have any problem learning keystrokes. I do have |
| 26 |
problems with vi's modality. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Grant |
Archives