1 |
On 10/05/2010 10:01 AM, BRM wrote: |
2 |
> ----- Original Message ---- |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
5 |
>> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
6 |
>> Cc: dhk <dhkuhl@×××××××××.net> |
7 |
>> Sent: Tue, October 5, 2010 7:34:02 AM |
8 |
>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] dev-util/autotoolset |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Apparently, though unproven, at 12:33 on Tuesday 05 October 2010, dhk did |
11 |
>> opine thusly: |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>>> On 10/05/2010 05:28 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
14 |
>>>> Apparently, though unproven, at 10:25 on Tuesday 05 October 2010, dhk did |
15 |
>>>> |
16 |
>>>> opine thusly: |
17 |
>>>>> What should I do about dev-util/autotoolset? I use it every day for a |
18 |
>>> >> project, but today it looks like I'm being told to remove it. What is |
19 |
>>>>> the alternative? |
20 |
>>>>> |
21 |
>>>>> In my package.keywords file I have "dev-util/autotoolset ~amd64" |
22 |
>>>>> unmasked since I use autotools for a project. |
23 |
>>>>> |
24 |
>>>>> After the output of "emerge -uDNp world" this morning the following |
25 |
>>> >> message is displayed. |
26 |
>>>>> |
27 |
>>>>> !!! The following installed packages are masked: |
28 |
>>>>> - dev-util/autotoolset-0.11.4-r1 (masked by: package.mask) |
29 |
>>>>> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: |
30 |
>>>>> # Diego E. Pettenò <flameeyes@g.o> (04 Oct 2010) |
31 |
>>>>> # on behalf of QA team |
32 |
>>>>> # |
33 |
>>> >> # Ironically, it is misusing autotools (bug #255831). It was |
34 |
>>> >> # added in 2004 and never version bumped since; autotools |
35 |
>>> >> # have since evolved a fair amount, while this is based |
36 |
>>> >> # still on automake 1.6. Avoid keeping it around. |
37 |
>>>>> # |
38 |
>>>>> # Removal on 2010-12-03 |
39 |
>>>>> |
40 |
>>>>> For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge |
41 |
>>> >> man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. |
42 |
>>>>> |
43 |
>>> >> As stated above, what should I "Avoid keeping it around?" Is it |
44 |
>>>>> autotoolset, automake 1.6, ...? Also, what's getting removed on |
45 |
>>>>> 2010-12-03? If autotoolset is removed, what should be used to build |
46 |
>>>>> projects? |
47 |
>>>> |
48 |
>>>> The text applies to autotoolset and the reason it is being removed. It |
49 |
> is |
50 |
>>>> autotoolset that is not being kept around anymore. |
51 |
>>>> |
52 |
>>>> It's actually quite obvious once you calm down, get over your fright, and |
53 |
>>>> read the message. |
54 |
>>>> |
55 |
>>>> You do not need autotoolset to build projects. You need autotools which |
56 |
>>>> is not the same thing. |
57 |
>>>> |
58 |
>>>>> Even though I have autotoolset installed, search shows it as being |
59 |
>>>>> masked. |
60 |
>>>>> |
61 |
>>>>> # emerge --search autotoolset |
62 |
>>>>> Searching... |
63 |
>>>>> [ Results for search key : autotoolset ] |
64 |
>>> >> [ Applications found : 1 ] |
65 |
>>>>> |
66 |
>>>>> * dev-util/autotoolset [ Masked ] |
67 |
>>>>> |
68 |
>>>>> Latest version available: 0.11.4-r1 |
69 |
>>>>> Latest version installed: 0.11.4-r1 |
70 |
>>>>> Size of files: 1,133 kB |
71 |
>>>>> Homepage: http://autotoolset.sourceforge.net/ |
72 |
>>>>> Description: colection of small tools to simplify project |
73 |
>>> >> |
74 |
>>>>> development with autotools |
75 |
>>>>> |
76 |
>>> >> License: GPL-2 |
77 |
>>> >> |
78 |
>>>>> What to do now? |
79 |
>>>> |
80 |
>>>> Why are you worried? You use autotools not autotoolset. Let the thing be |
81 |
>>>> removed, After 6 years of no updates you shouldn't be using it anyway. |
82 |
>>> |
83 |
>>> So are you saying if I remove autotoolset that I'll still have autoconf, |
84 |
>>> automake, and the rest; and everything will work the same? I thought |
85 |
>>> all the autotools were in autotoolset. I guess I don't know the |
86 |
>>> difference between autotools and autotoolset and what they are made up of. |
87 |
>> |
88 |
>> |
89 |
>> autotools != autotoolset |
90 |
>> |
91 |
>> The description from eix that you yourself posted tells you as much. |
92 |
>> |
93 |
>> Run "equery files autotoolset" and see what is in the package. Decide for |
94 |
>> yourself if you want to keep it and if so move the ebuild to your local |
95 |
>> overlay where you can maintain it for yourself. |
96 |
> |
97 |
> Reading over the website it seems almost as if it is a fork of GNU autotools. |
98 |
> |
99 |
> http://autotoolset.sourceforge.net/ |
100 |
> |
101 |
> But to the original question - if they do not remain installed then you can |
102 |
> always install them individually as well. |
103 |
> |
104 |
> Ben |
105 |
> |
106 |
> |
107 |
> |
108 |
|
109 |
I thought all the auto tools were in the autotoolset, that's not the |
110 |
case. It looks like the only tool I use in autotoolset is acmkdir. If |
111 |
I remove autotoolset, how can I get acmkdir back? Even though it's not |
112 |
necessary, it's a nice tool for starting a project. |
113 |
|
114 |
Thanks, |
115 |
|
116 |
dhk |