Archives
Archives
| From: | Wols Lists <antlists@××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6 | ||
| Date: | Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:46:01 | ||
| Message-Id: | 5A2D024C.2050301@youngman.org.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6 by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On 09/12/17 23:36, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 | > you instead compute 5 sets of parity so that now you have 9 sets of |
| 3 | > data that can tolerate the loss of any 5, then throw away the sets |
| 4 | > containing the original 4 sets of data and store the remaining 5 sets |
| 5 | > of parity data across the 5 drives. You can still tolerate the loss |
| 6 | > of one more set, but all 4 of the original sets of data have been |
| 7 | > tossed already. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Is that how ZFS works? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Cheers, |
| 12 | Wol |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6 | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |