1 |
On Tuesday 09 May 2017 14:29:16 Walter Dnes wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> It's a feature, not a bug. <G> There's a news item being worked on in |
4 |
> the Gentoo dev list. I'd normally just link to a mail archive, but it's |
5 |
> too new to have been archived yet. Here's a copy of the proposed news |
6 |
> item. |
7 |
|
8 |
(Quoting order changed.) |
9 |
|
10 |
Sorry, Walter, but I just couldn't let this go. Reading it hurt too much. |
11 |
|
12 |
English grammar has very few hard-and-fast rules, but one is absolutely |
13 |
sacrosanct: every verb agrees in number with its subject. If I'd been guilty |
14 |
of this at school I'd have earned myself a stiff rebuke: |
15 |
|
16 |
> An indicator are linker errors ... |
17 |
|
18 |
[...] |
19 |
|
20 |
> [Additionally, following Gentoo policies, the default-off use-flags |
21 |
> nopie (only present in Hardened) and nossp are replaced starting with |
22 |
> gcc-6 by default-on use-flags pie and ssp.] |
23 |
|
24 |
No; they are replaced, by the developers, with those flags. |
25 |
|
26 |
> Be advised that switching from an older version to GCC 6 will ... |
27 |
|
28 |
Those first three words are redundant; they add nothing. |
29 |
|
30 |
> ... relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used |
31 |
> when... |
32 |
|
33 |
"Can not" should be "cannot" (different meaning). |
34 |
|
35 |
I did say this is all off-topic. Apologies to anyone who feels aggrieved. I |
36 |
could have suggested several other improvements as well, so I could say I've |
37 |
let you off lightly. ;-) |
38 |
|
39 |
(By way of explanation, 35 years ago I was made the documentation manager of |
40 |
a 200-man-year software project. Ever since then I've been unable to read |
41 |
anything at all without the eye of an editor - it's ruined my enjoyment of |
42 |
everything I read. There's no hope any longer.) |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Regards |
46 |
Peter |