| 1 |
Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> [12-02-03 17:06]: |
| 2 |
> meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > I treid the jack-audio-connection as supported by portage and had no |
| 6 |
> > success at all with my hardware. I didn't find the reason, why it |
| 7 |
> > alwasys killed itself after a short time. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > With JACK 1.9.8 (jack2) installed from source it works. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > I had to emerge -C jack-audio-connection for that. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Now emerge/portage thinks, that jack-audio-connection-kit is missing |
| 14 |
> > of course... |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > I dont want to use layman or similiar. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > How can I convince portage in a "legal way" that this dependency is |
| 19 |
> > satisfied? |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > Thank you very much for any help in advance! |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > Best regards, |
| 24 |
> > mcc |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> You are looking for package provided settings. Try here: |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3&chap=5 |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> All the way down to the bottom. Then here: |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/doc/man/portage.5.html |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> It is about 1/4 of the way down on that page. Use the search function |
| 41 |
> and search for provided. |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> Hope that helps. I never have used it but have read about it. |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> Dale |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> :-) :-) |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
> -- |
| 50 |
> I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
| 51 |
> how you interpreted my words! |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> Miss the compile output? Hint: |
| 54 |
> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
Hi, |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
thank you _very_ much for the hints. That is far more easier than I |
| 60 |
exspected to be allowed to believe ;). |
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
One thing remains: |
| 63 |
I found no way to 'provide' a package without a versioning. Is it |
| 64 |
possible ? |
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
And: |
| 67 |
Let package 'C' depend on package 'B' which depends on package 'A'. |
| 68 |
C is installed. |
| 69 |
B is in entry in package.provided and installed from external sources. |
| 70 |
A is installed. |
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
Now I ran |
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
emerge --depclean -vp |
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
and it suggests to remove C. |
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
Is it possible to take B as provided as an replacement for that |
| 79 |
package of the same name inside the portage tree since it uses exactly |
| 80 |
the same nameing so it will depend on the same ....hrmmms.... dependencies??? |
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
Or am I talking nonsense....? |
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
Best regards, |
| 85 |
mcc |
Archives