1 |
James wrote: |
2 |
> Dale <rdalek1967 <at> gmail.com> writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>>> I need to monitor this hardware for temperatures, including logging |
6 |
>>> of temperatures, on as wide array of temperature sensors that is |
7 |
>>> possible with kernel 3.18.6-gentoo.) |
8 |
>> I'm not sure if this is still available or not but doesn't gkrellm do |
9 |
>> this sort of thing? I used it to monitor another rig several years |
10 |
>> ago. May be worth looking into. |
11 |
>> Dale |
12 |
> |
13 |
> That (gkrellm) codebase looks old, un-maintained and wee bit clumsy. It's |
14 |
> interesting to examine for ideas. I think I'm going with something a bit more |
15 |
> embedded inspired, for speed and portability reasons. I also have since |
16 |
> found this interesting piece of code; |
17 |
> |
18 |
> sys-cluster/ganglia |
19 |
> |
20 |
> First glance, it's a bit heavy-handed for my needs. I've gotta keep |
21 |
> looking before I decide on a path forward for RT temperature monitoring, |
22 |
> dB tracking and problem profiling. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Thanks! |
25 |
> James |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
While it has been a while since I used gkrellm to monitor a remote |
30 |
system, I use it every day to monitor my system I sit at. Keep in mind, |
31 |
not much changes on how gkrellm works. It looks for temp/fan/CPU/memory |
32 |
etc info and displays it. I'm not sure it requires a whole lot of |
33 |
updating to do that especially given it has worked fine here for ages |
34 |
and not much has really changed. |
35 |
|
36 |
It was the remote part that I wasn't sure about. I know it used to have |
37 |
that feature and if it still does, the remote part works just like the |
38 |
local part does. You just tell it to monitor something other than the |
39 |
system you are sitting at. |
40 |
|
41 |
Sorry I wasn't more clear in my first message. |
42 |
|
43 |
Dale |
44 |
|
45 |
:-) :-) |