| 1 |
On 06/09/2014 15:13, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> ZFS is the most resilient filesystem I've ever used, you can through the |
| 5 |
>> bucket and kitchen sink at it and it really doesn't give a shit (it just |
| 6 |
>> deals with it :-) ) |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Nothing wrong with ZFS itself, but keep in mind that ZFS on linux is |
| 10 |
> not the same as ZFS on Solaris as far as maturity goes. I'll admit |
| 11 |
> that I'm a btrfs fan for a couple of reasons, but when it comes to |
| 12 |
> stability on linux I wouldn't put either in the same class as ext3, or |
| 13 |
> even ext4 (which is pretty mature now). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I neglected to mention - I use ZFS on FreeBSD, haven't used ZFS on linux |
| 17 |
enought o comment on that |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 25 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives