| 1 |
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Michel Catudal <mcatudal@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Le 2015-08-27 15:18, Fernando Rodriguez a écrit : |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Who are you to tell them what they should work on? They're acting like |
| 5 |
>> FOSS developers, many of whom work for free or underpaid so they work on |
| 6 |
>> whatever the fuck they want. The problem with FOSS is that we have too many |
| 7 |
>> idiots that like to rant about what they don't like instead of doing |
| 8 |
>> something about it. If all those energies went to improving the software |
| 9 |
>> FOSS would be so much better. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> No one is asking them to do that. As mentioned before it works with some |
| 12 |
> override. A solution to the problem would be to remove the arrogance toward |
| 13 |
> people who want grub on a partition and remove the part in the installer |
| 14 |
> that refuses to install it unless you give it an override. If I say write |
| 15 |
> the bootloader on the partition, that should work as requested, they can |
| 16 |
> still write a comment that they do not like us doing it but should not keep |
| 17 |
> us from doing it. If it doesn't work we will see it soon enough. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
So you want the Gentoo grub2 maintainer to patch grub2 to remove the |
| 20 |
warning about partitions and the need for "--force" so that you can |
| 21 |
use "grub2-install /dev/sda1"? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Isn't simpleer and more efficient for you to use "--force"?! |
Archives