1 |
On 11/5/05, Nick Rout <nick@×××××××.nz> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 19:48:04 -0800 |
3 |
> Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > On 11/5/05, gentuxx <gentuxx@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
7 |
> > > Hash: SHA1 |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > Mark Knecht wrote: |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > >Hi, |
12 |
> > > > My wife is asking if there is an easy way to keep a list of all web |
13 |
> > > >sites visited on a specific computer in the house. I don't know about |
14 |
> > > >such stuff. Is there any way to do that for either Mozilla or Firefox? |
15 |
> > > > |
16 |
> > > >Thanks, |
17 |
> > > >Mark |
18 |
> > > > |
19 |
> > > It would depend on how your home network is set up. A squid proxy |
20 |
> > > could work for you. What are you trying to accomplish? |
21 |
> > > |
22 |
> > Thanks. I'll look into squid. I guess with squid all of that machine's |
23 |
> > requests go to this machine and then it forwards stuff on, keeping a |
24 |
> > record? Is that the basic idea? |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > If so, does that mean that all traffic for the machine in question |
27 |
> > actually does through the squid machine? If so that might mean too |
28 |
> > much wireless traffic the way we are set up. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> yes thats the point of squid it is a proxy. |
31 |
|
32 |
OK, but that's like using the word in the definition to a guy who's |
33 |
never used a proxy. ;-) |
34 |
|
35 |
I'm still unclear though, and I'm sure I'll find this out either |
36 |
through reading or use. do all packets for the machine using the proxy |
37 |
go through the proxy? Or is it more like a DNS server where just the |
38 |
URL's go through the proxy to figure out what to do? |
39 |
|
40 |
Right now the machine under observation is on one wireless leg. The |
41 |
one machine that's on all the time is on anothe wireless leg. Neither |
42 |
is directly tied to the cable modem. If the traffic pattern looks like |
43 |
|
44 |
M_OBSERVE -> router -> M_SQUID -> router -> Internet -> router -> |
45 |
M_SQUID -> router -> M_OBSERVE |
46 |
|
47 |
The I created a lot of extra wireless traffic, especially since the |
48 |
machine being observed seems to like to watch a lot of gaming videos. |
49 |
If it's just addresses, then no big deal. If it's the whole data |
50 |
stream then it's not going to work well. |
51 |
|
52 |
On the other hand I have a MythTV frontend that is not always turned |
53 |
on but could be, I suppose, which is on the router, as are a few of my |
54 |
audio machines. I'm loath to start putting this stuff on machines in |
55 |
my studio.... |
56 |
|
57 |
|
58 |
> |
59 |
> |
60 |
> > |
61 |
> > Or is it just the addresses that are proxied? |
62 |
> > |
63 |
> > As for purpose, as I said earlier my wife wants to know all web sites |
64 |
> > that a certain computer on our network visits over time. |
65 |
> |
66 |
> trouble with the kids? |
67 |
|
68 |
:-) |
69 |
|
70 |
Thanks, |
71 |
Mark |
72 |
|
73 |
-- |
74 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |