1 |
On 2010-02-23, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:33:56 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>> No, I read them from a number of machines but using a single |
5 |
>>> server that handles all the filtering too. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Same here -- the only difference between the two approaches is |
8 |
>> who's administering the server. You handle it yourself, I let |
9 |
>> gmane do it. :) |
10 |
> |
11 |
> The main difference is that mine still works when my Internet |
12 |
> connection is not available. |
13 |
|
14 |
I read the mailing lists from many different locations. I don't |
15 |
keep complete Usenet and mailing-list archives at all machines |
16 |
and locations. It doesn't really matter to me where the server |
17 |
is -- if I've no network access, I can't read Usenet or mailing |
18 |
lists. But, it's just not an issue. |
19 |
|
20 |
> And that all my mail is accessible from the same place, |
21 |
> including mails I'd never put on a server owned by someone |
22 |
> else. |
23 |
|
24 |
I guess I just have no interest in keeping archives of 50 |
25 |
newsgroups/mailing-lists on a handful of different machines. |
26 |
Any "servers" I set up would be a lot less reliable and |
27 |
accessible than those at either Gmane or my Usenet provider. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Grant Edwards grante Yow! So this is what it |
31 |
at feels like to be potato |
32 |
visi.com salad |