1 |
On 01/09/2016 09:18, gevisz wrote: |
2 |
> 2016-09-01 9:13 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>: |
3 |
>> On 01/09/2016 08:04, gevisz wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
[snip] |
6 |
|
7 |
>> it will take about 5 seconds to partition it. |
8 |
>> And a few more to mkfs it. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Just to partition - may be, but I very much doubt |
11 |
> that it will take seconds to create a full-fledged |
12 |
> ext4 file system on these 5TB via USB2 connention. |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
Do it. Tell me how long it tool. |
16 |
|
17 |
Discussing it without doing it and offering someone else's opinion is a |
18 |
100% worthless activity |
19 |
|
20 |
> |
21 |
> Even more: my aquiantance from the Window world |
22 |
> that recomended me this disc scared me that it may |
23 |
> take days... |
24 |
|
25 |
Mickey Mouse told me it takes microseconds. So what? |
26 |
|
27 |
Do it. Tell me how long it took. |
28 |
|
29 |
>>> Is it still advisable to partition a big hard drive |
30 |
>>> into smaller logical ones and why? |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> The only reason to partition a drive is to get 2 or more |
33 |
>> smaller ones that differ somehow (size, inode ratio, mount options, etc) |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>> Go with no partition table by all means, but if you one day find you |
36 |
>> need one, you will have to copy all your data off, repartition, and copy |
37 |
>> your data back. If you are certain that will not happen (eg you will |
38 |
>> rather buy a second drive) then by all means dispense with partitions. |
39 |
>> |
40 |
>> They are after all nothing more than a Microsoft invention from the 80s |
41 |
>> so people could install UCSD Pascal next to MS-DOS |
42 |
> |
43 |
> I definitely will not need more than one mount point for this hard drive |
44 |
> but I do remember some arguments that partitioning a large hard drive |
45 |
> into smaller logical ones gives me more safety in case a file system |
46 |
> suddenly will get corrupted because in this case I will loose my data |
47 |
> only on one of the logical partitions and not on the whole drive. |
48 |
> |
49 |
> Is this argument still valid nowadays? |
50 |
|
51 |
That is the most stupid dumbass argument I've heard in weeks. |
52 |
It doesn't even deserve a response. |
53 |
|
54 |
Who the fuck is promoting this shit? |
55 |
|
56 |
|
57 |
-- |
58 |
Alan McKinnon |
59 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |