| 1 |
Hello Daniel Iliev, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Actually I'd be glad to read some results from a "Fake RAID-0 vs LVM" |
| 4 |
> tests. My bet would be that RAID-0 w/o LVM would give the best speeds |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Omitting LVM isn't an option, I'd lose all the flexibility that LVM |
| 7 |
offers. I don't see why RAID-0 should be necessarily more efficient than |
| 8 |
LVM, unless there's something superior about RAID-0's striping |
| 9 |
algorithms. I could do some before and after tests, but I'd first have the |
| 10 |
reformat the filesystems to remove any effects of fragmentation. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
If no one comes up with a good reason for keeping the RAID, I'll get rid |
| 13 |
of it, running bonnie++ before and after. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Contentsoftaglinemaysettleduringshipping. |
Archives