Archives
Archives
| From: | Uwe Thiem <uwix@××××.na> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] QT 4 | ||
| Date: | Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:21:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200603170915.27002.uwix@iway.na | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] QT 4 by Glenn Enright |
||
| 1 | On 17 March 2006 05:16, Glenn Enright wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Just out of interest how far along is qt4? Last time I looked the next |
| 4 | > major release of kde *might* be using it, if it becomes stable in time. Is |
| 5 | > this still the case? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | The current version is Qt-4.1.1 AFAIK and it's pretty stable. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | KDE4 will be base on Qt4, no "if". |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Uwe |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Why do consumers keep buying products they will live to curse? |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: QT 4 | James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> |