1 |
On 16 May 2014 7:46:29 PM AEST, "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at> wrote: |
2 |
>Am 15.05.2014 20:33, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: |
3 |
>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger |
4 |
><lists@×××××.at> wrote: |
5 |
>>> Am 15.05.2014 20:05, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>>> With -H, you don't get the kernel cmdline, and therefore your |
8 |
>kernel |
9 |
>>>> cannot load your LVM volumes since it doesn't know their... names? |
10 |
>I |
11 |
>>>> don't knot the terminology. |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>> In any case, you need to set --hostonly-cmdline (or |
14 |
>>>> hostonly_cmdline="yes" in the config file), *besides* -H. |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> ok ... I pulled your changes (kerninst) from github ... on the web I |
17 |
>see |
18 |
>>> it, but it doesn't get into my copy here ... strange. |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>>> As I don't need it right now, I will (a) wait or (b) edit manually. |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>>> No problem. |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> I actually *removed* -H from kerninst. That should be configured in |
25 |
>> the user's dracut.conf; now I have: |
26 |
>> |
27 |
>> hostonly="yes" |
28 |
>> hostonly_cmdline="yes" |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> in my dracut.conf. |
31 |
> |
32 |
>Yes, I understood ... thanks. |
33 |
> |
34 |
>Aside from that a more general question: |
35 |
> |
36 |
>Does it it any way help to have a *small* (= as small as possible) |
37 |
>initramfs? |
38 |
> |
39 |
>Maybe on embedded systems but on the big multi-GB-ram-machines we use |
40 |
>it |
41 |
>doesn't make much difference, right? |
42 |
> |
43 |
>I ask because in all my reorganizing furor I also thought that now with |
44 |
>btrfs only I could get rid of "lvm mdraid" as dracut-modules. I can try |
45 |
>... ;-) (don't call me "ricer") |
46 |
|
47 |
If you have a multi-disk btrfs, I think you need to add the btrfs dracut module. At least that's how I remember it, but its been a while & my memory could be failing me, or it could well have changed since then. |
48 |
|
49 |
Bruce |
50 |
-- |
51 |
:B |