| 1 |
Arttu V. <arttuv69@×××××.com> [09-02-01 17:49]: |
| 2 |
> Mr Cramer, you replied in private email, but your blacklist bounced/dropped my |
| 3 |
> consequent reply. Replying on-list: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Saturday 31 January 2009 18:07:02 you wrote: |
| 6 |
> > But emerge tolds me: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > emerge -pv rasqual |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Calculating dependencies... done! |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "rasqual". |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> There is a typo: just drop the extra 'u'. It's just rasqal, like you used it |
| 17 |
> correctly here below: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > while qsearch says: |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > qsearch rasqal |
| 22 |
> > dev-libs/rasqal library that handles Resource Description Framework (RDF) |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > Before I screw up my system: |
| 25 |
> > Is there something more fundamental damaged? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> This is the spot where I think FEATURES="buildpkg" should be |
| 28 |
> mentioned. It will help you roll back the old binaries should |
| 29 |
> something bad happen. It is mentioned on the list regularly by many |
| 30 |
> posters, most of them more experienced with it than I am. :) |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Still, I don't think upgrading rasqal should cause major havoc. Worst |
| 33 |
> thing that happened to this box was that openoffice and soprano wanted |
| 34 |
> to be re-emerged. So just some automated extra compiling, no big deal |
| 35 |
> for me. YMMV |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> > Or does rasqal only exists as unstable ebuild (reading your posting |
| 38 |
> > I would tend to answer this with "NO" ... |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> 0.9.10 has been stable on Gentoo for nearly three years according to |
| 41 |
> /usr/portage/dev-libs/rasqal/ChangeLog |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> The newer versions have had some bugs reported, but they have been |
| 44 |
> fixed. You can look them up in bugs.gentoo.org if you're worried. |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> -- |
| 47 |
> Arttu V. |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
Hi Arttu ! |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
Thank you very much for fixing my typos...! :O) |
| 53 |
I have to clean my glasses again, I think ... ;) |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
Now the build succeeds. |
| 56 |
Nevertheless, starting sonic-visualisers complains: |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
sonic-visualiser: error while loading shared libraries: libvamp-hostsdk.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
I cannot find libvamp-hostsdk. |
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
Neither emergeing libvamp-hostsdk succeeds (no such package/ebuild) |
| 63 |
nor qsearching libvamp-hostsdk or libvamp or hostsdk |
| 64 |
produces anything which I can use to detect the correct package |
| 65 |
to emerge... |
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
Kind regards |
| 68 |
Meino Cramer |
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
-- |
| 72 |
Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments |
| 73 |
unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text. |
| 74 |
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html |
| 75 |
In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows. |
Archives