1 |
So, I restored all the files, I could like sendmail.mc and the |
2 |
Sendmail.conf, but no joy, still no authentication mechanisms. I |
3 |
restored them to about first of April. This still leads me to saslauthd. |
4 |
|
5 |
On Thu, 05 May 2022 12:52:45 -0400, |
6 |
Grant Taylor wrote: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> On 5/5/22 10:39 AM, John Covici wrote: |
9 |
> > saslauthd is running, but it seems to ignore the Sendmail.conf . |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I think it's the other way around. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Sendmail is told to support authentication via one or more |
14 |
> methods, one of which can be SASL and co. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> The actual SASL auth daemon just listens on a unix socket and / |
17 |
> or TCP port for clients to test authentication pairs, returning a |
18 |
> pass fail type message. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> > I used openssl s_client to connect to my sendmail, it was happy |
21 |
> > with the certs, but in response to the ehlo gives me no auth |
22 |
> > line at all. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> :-/ |
25 |
> |
26 |
> > Very strange. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Very annoying, definitely. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> I don't know if it's strange yet or not. I think the strangeness |
31 |
> will be confirmed or refuted after finding out why Sendmail isn't |
32 |
> offering AUTH options. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> My favorite thing to turn to when things that used to work and |
35 |
> now don't is to restore a backup of the configuration file and |
36 |
> compare them. Can you do that with your sendmail.cf or |
37 |
> sendmail.mc file? |
38 |
> |
39 |
> There's also a chance that it's your submit.cf or submit.mc file |
40 |
> since we're talking about the MSA on port 587. (Unless you |
41 |
> aren't using the separate MSA which has been standard for 15+ |
42 |
> years.) |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
> -- |
47 |
> Grant. . . . |
48 |
> unix || die |
49 |
> |
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
53 |
How do |
54 |
you spend it? |
55 |
|
56 |
John Covici wb2una |
57 |
covici@××××××××××.com |