| 1 |
On 5/5/22 10:39 AM, John Covici wrote: |
| 2 |
> saslauthd is running, but it seems to ignore the Sendmail.conf . |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I think it's the other way around. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Sendmail is told to support authentication via one or more methods, one |
| 7 |
of which can be SASL and co. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The actual SASL auth daemon just listens on a unix socket and / or TCP |
| 10 |
port for clients to test authentication pairs, returning a pass fail |
| 11 |
type message. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> I used openssl s_client to connect to my sendmail, it was happy with |
| 14 |
> the certs, but in response to the ehlo gives me no auth line at all. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
:-/ |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Very strange. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Very annoying, definitely. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I don't know if it's strange yet or not. I think the strangeness will |
| 23 |
be confirmed or refuted after finding out why Sendmail isn't offering |
| 24 |
AUTH options. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
My favorite thing to turn to when things that used to work and now don't |
| 27 |
is to restore a backup of the configuration file and compare them. Can |
| 28 |
you do that with your sendmail.cf or sendmail.mc file? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
There's also a chance that it's your submit.cf or submit.mc file since |
| 31 |
we're talking about the MSA on port 587. (Unless you aren't using the |
| 32 |
separate MSA which has been standard for 15+ years.) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Grant. . . . |
| 38 |
unix || die |
Archives