| 1 |
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 01:36:56 PM Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > But that's the thing: we (you and me) don't see the situation the same |
| 5 |
> > way. To me, the proposed changes are for the better. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> You are one of very few that feel this way. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
You are probably correct that he's one of the relatively few people (along |
| 10 |
with the udev developer, and those few people for whom it will fix their |
| 11 |
problems) who think these changes are a real improvement. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I would estimate that the vast, vast, vast majority of users are those such as |
| 14 |
myslelf, who have no opinion whatsoever, and either will not be affected at all |
| 15 |
by these changes (because they don't separate / and /usr), or will simply |
| 16 |
apply the proposed initramfs solution and move on. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Then there are those relatively few people, such as the handful making up the |
| 19 |
rest of this thread, who think that these changes are a horrible idea and will |
| 20 |
have a severe deterimental affect on their systems. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Not that the relative "size" of the various sides in this debate is really the |
| 23 |
issue, but despite the tone of this and the other thread, I don't think |
| 24 |
there's really a huge, overwhelming outcry against these changes. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
--Mike |
Archives