Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: congruant gentoo servers
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:26:04
Message-Id: loom.20080627T182326-393@post.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] congruant gentoo servers by Alan McKinnon
1 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon <at> gmail.com> writes:
2
3
4 > Is the new (minimal) system a strict sub-set of the old (bloated one)?
5 > As in, could you add to the minimal config a bunch of USE flags (that
6 > would not change the overall behaviour of what is already there),
7 > emerge a lot of new packages, and basically arrive at what you have on
8 > the bloated machine?
9
10
11 No,
12
13 Years ago they were similar. Then the minimal system lost a hard drive
14 and I reinstalled it, as a minimal gentoo server. The bloated one
15 has been a workstation and had all sorts of gui/kde stuffage installed
16 on it.
17
18
19 James
20
21
22
23
24
25 --
26 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: congruant gentoo servers Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>