Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT encfs] When encfs gets hungup | ||
| Date: | Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:23:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201107120009.42307.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT encfs] When encfs gets hungup by Neil Bothwick |
||
| 1 | On Monday 11 July 2011 22:01:02 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > But an admitted pedantic response deserves a reply from the OED :P |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ...which is no more than an observer of trends. It offers precious little |
| 6 | help in what one ought to do. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | A few years ago our Queen uttered a solecism (well, it had to happen sooner |
| 9 | or later, and as far as I know it's the only one). The gutter press were |
| 10 | delighted to announce a new usage: "if it's good enough for the queen, it's |
| 11 | good enough for the rest of us". |
| 12 | |
| 13 | How sad. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Rgds |
| 17 | Peter |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] [OT encfs] When encfs gets hungup | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| [gentoo-user] Re: [OT encfs] When encfs gets hungup | walt <w41ter@×××××.com> |