| 1 |
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@×××××.com>wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > So I guess Linus is confused to? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> In your head, and only in your head, you're agreeing with Linus. Linus |
| 7 |
> was talking about a different bug entirely from the one you're talking |
| 8 |
> about. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The bug you're talking about: you go on and on about people saying |
| 11 |
> that your personal system is broken when it's been working for years. |
| 12 |
> Again, NOBODY said that. What was said, what you are not able to |
| 13 |
> refute, is that yes, the case for the / and /usr split IS broken, and |
| 14 |
> something needs to be done about that moving forward. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > Name calling, lost argument. No more facts. |
| 17 |
> I've repeatedly proposed technical solutions to your issues with the |
| 18 |
> fact that udev is doing something about that and you continue to whine |
| 19 |
> all night about the bogey-men breaking into your boxes. In fact, |
| 20 |
> between just you and me, I believe I'm the only one who backed up |
| 21 |
> anything he said with anything even remotely approaching technical |
| 22 |
> merit. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> 1) initramfs. It's not that hard |
| 25 |
> 2) early mount script. It's not that hard. |
| 26 |
> 3) modify your udev ebuild to install to /. It's not that hard. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
If you'd read the thread (and/or related ones), you'd know he tried to go |
| 30 |
the initrd route, and spent a solid week on the project. You're not talking |
| 31 |
to someone who hasn't tried to tread the path. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
:wq |
Archives