| 1 |
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> So I guess Linus is confused to? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
In your head, and only in your head, you're agreeing with Linus. Linus |
| 5 |
was talking about a different bug entirely from the one you're talking |
| 6 |
about. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
The bug you're talking about: you go on and on about people saying |
| 9 |
that your personal system is broken when it's been working for years. |
| 10 |
Again, NOBODY said that. What was said, what you are not able to |
| 11 |
refute, is that yes, the case for the / and /usr split IS broken, and |
| 12 |
something needs to be done about that moving forward. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Name calling, lost argument. No more facts. |
| 15 |
I've repeatedly proposed technical solutions to your issues with the |
| 16 |
fact that udev is doing something about that and you continue to whine |
| 17 |
all night about the bogey-men breaking into your boxes. In fact, |
| 18 |
between just you and me, I believe I'm the only one who backed up |
| 19 |
anything he said with anything even remotely approaching technical |
| 20 |
merit. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
1) initramfs. It's not that hard |
| 23 |
2) early mount script. It's not that hard. |
| 24 |
3) modify your udev ebuild to install to /. It's not that hard. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
None of this is being prevented by the vengeful Lennart you're so afraid of. |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [x] social |
| 29 |
Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no |
| 30 |
Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none |
Archives