| 1 |
Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
| 2 |
> I think your reaction proves my point about angry mobs torching his |
| 3 |
> home without understanding what's being proposed. Your fine reading |
| 4 |
> comprehension once again failed to catch the notion that in my |
| 5 |
> analogy, all he invented was a mechanism that makes sure it was a key, |
| 6 |
> not a spark plug, that did the starting. i.e., you're asking literally |
| 7 |
> for a turnkey system, and that's literally what he invented, except |
| 8 |
> that the system guarantees that it's a key that was turned. You have |
| 9 |
> not said a THING about your misunderstanding of the use of the word |
| 10 |
> _broken_ and you're continuing to peddle your hate-boner even after |
| 11 |
> it's been shown that you're confused. -- This email is: [ ] actionable |
| 12 |
> [ ] fyi [x] social Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no |
| 13 |
> Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
So I guess Linus is confused to? You think he is just a hate-boner? I |
| 16 |
would think Linus if anyone knows what he is talking about. Maybe you |
| 17 |
need to go talk to him about his feeling on the direction of |
| 18 |
udev/systemd. Good luck with that. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Name calling, lost argument. No more facts. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Dale |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
:-) :-) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives