| 1 |
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Yohan Pereira <yohan.pereira@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 30/01/13 at 11:09pm, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Since Gentoo updates libraries very quickly, I'm wondering if it is |
| 4 |
>> safe to use the binary version? Has anyone faced library breakages on |
| 5 |
>> this? |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Chromium is easily recompiled with new libraries and you don't have a |
| 8 |
>> broken browser, which won't really be the case with the binary |
| 9 |
>> version. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I've used the binary version (google-chrome) for a while and never |
| 12 |
> had any breakages. I guess if there's a library update that could |
| 13 |
> potentially break google-chrome the gentoo devs would add a blocker so |
| 14 |
> you wont be able to install the 2 at the same time. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Or I can just bundle a copy of the necessary libraries, similar to |
| 18 |
what I have done for libudev.so.0. |
Archives