1 |
> -----Original Message----- |
2 |
> From: mwq [mailto:mwq@××.pl] |
3 |
> Sent: 10 March 2007 21:00 |
4 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
5 |
> Subject: [gentoo-user] RAID |
6 |
> |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I have one laic question which may not be directly connected |
9 |
> to Gentoo but I think you'll forgive me that. |
10 |
> Imagine such a situation: I have two hard drives but drive A |
11 |
> is twice faster when reading and writing then drive B. I want |
12 |
> to make RAID 0 using A and B. Why are the stripes sizes on |
13 |
> both drives excacly the same? (I've googled and didn't find |
14 |
> any information about different spripes sizes) I think that |
15 |
> using twice greater stripe on A gives more speed then using |
16 |
> equal stripes. |
17 |
> And my question is: where am I doing a mistake? |
18 |
> PS |
19 |
> Sorry for my poor English |
20 |
> |
21 |
> -- |
22 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
Forgive me the maths approach here, but if drive A reads/writes at speed a, and drive B at speed b.
|
27 |
|
28 |
a = 2*b from what you have said.
|
29 |
In raid 0 drive speed is limited by the slower drive (if I recall correctly) so the speed your raid array would be limited to is .... b + b = 2b = a (from above).
|
30 |
|
31 |
Hence you would be as well not bothering with RAID if drive A is 2x as fast as drive B.
|
32 |
|
33 |
Naturally it's not as clear cut but should be pretty close. RAID 0ing these drives would gain you little in terms of speed while any 2 drive RAID 0 setup increases the chance of failure by 2.
|
34 |
|
35 |
If you just want them to appear as one drive look at something like LVM which can create one volume from both drives, although parts of the volume on drive A would be faster than those parts on drive B.
|
36 |
|
37 |
Just my £0.02, feel free to poke holes in my reasoning ;)
|
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
--
|
41 |
djn
|
42 |
|
43 |
I do not represent anyone else in emails I send to this list. |