1 |
I'm using firefox-bin ( and libreoffice-bin ) on my laptop and I didn't have problems with either of them |
2 |
|
3 |
Regards, |
4 |
Rasmus |
5 |
-------- Original Message -------- |
6 |
On 22 Jun 2017, 09:34, Danny YUE wrote: |
7 |
|
8 |
On 2017-06-22 07:23, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: |
9 |
>> Does anyone knows why? Any idea? |
10 |
> The reason is in that fact, that many of it's components are in rust. |
11 |
> And since it was possible to dodge it until now, maintainers considered it is |
12 |
> not a way since now. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> And, by the way, it is not that many time to build rust, as you think: |
15 |
>> Thu Jun 22 12:34:00 2017 >>> dev-lang/rust-1.16.0 |
16 |
>> merge time: 1 hour, 48 minutes. |
17 |
> Than was on 1.9GHz with hardly limited portage (MAKEOPTS="-j5 -l2", |
18 |
> NICENESS=18, ionice -c3, and cgroupped on cpu shares and ram). |
19 |
> |
20 |
> So, ~20 mins would be enough on non-limited portage and full power of that i7. |
21 |
|
22 |
Thank you all for replying. |
23 |
|
24 |
So it can be around 30~40 minutes or so on my i5 machine. |
25 |
Just it feels strange to install something large that I would probably |
26 |
never use myself. |
27 |
|
28 |
I am considering using binary package instead of compiling it myself. |
29 |
|
30 |
But I am afraid that using firefox-bin package would cause some |
31 |
dependency problem. I once tried libreoffice-bin, but found it really |
32 |
painful to resolve dependency issues during system upgrading. |
33 |
|
34 |
Anyone tried firefox-bin smoothly? |
35 |
|
36 |
Danny |
37 |
@mva.name> |