1 |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Peter Humphrey |
2 |
<peter@××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
> On Monday 17 September 2012 22:22:50 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> I believe that's the beauty of options like CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND. If |
6 |
>> you leave the machine running crunching numbers (of whatever), with |
7 |
>> USB_SUSPEND the devices not used (say, the backup disk you transfer |
8 |
>> to the results of your crunching every weekend) can be suspended, |
9 |
>> saving a little bit of power. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> No, I don't need that, having no superfluous devices connected. My weekly |
12 |
> backup is of the entire system to an external USB disk. Not from the |
13 |
> running system; I reboot to a mini system (which I call a rescue system) |
14 |
> each Sunday morning and backup the entire system to USB disk. So far I |
15 |
> haven't needed to recover more than a small section of the backup. |
16 |
> |
17 |
>> You don't leave the monitor turned on and disable the power off |
18 |
>> features of it, right? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I resent the kernel's insistence on deciding when my monitor should be |
21 |
> switched off. I'm perfectly capable of doing that myself, thank you very |
22 |
> much. |
23 |
|
24 |
Well, if that's the way you feel, you obviously don't use (nor need) |
25 |
udisks, and take care of everything that goes on with your machine, |
26 |
like when to flush I/O or when to move memory pages to swap. |
27 |
|
28 |
Me? I'm lazy; the more my OS takes trivial decisions from me, the more |
29 |
time I have to do interesting stuff and get actual work done. That's |
30 |
why I use Linux/systemd/PulseAudio/bluez/GNOME; the decisions they |
31 |
take are usually the smart ones (from my point of view). |
32 |
|
33 |
But that's just me. |
34 |
|
35 |
Regards. |
36 |
-- |
37 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
38 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
39 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |