Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3?
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:27:10
Message-Id: 20130424092652.2061e49a@hactar.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3? by Philip Webb
1 On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:37:52 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
2
3 > > I've used ReiserFS3 for years with no problems,
4 > > but I keep hearing horror stories about it.
5 >
6 > I haven't read any horror stories re Reiser 3 ,
7
8 Where have you been f0r the last ten years? A quick search of this list's
9 archives will reveal several.
10
11 > > My understanding is that BTRFS and EXT4 are still a bit "bleeding
12 > > edge".
13 >
14 > My impression is that Btrfs is a bit unstable, but Ext4 is usable.
15 > I haven't used either.
16
17 SUSE are using btrfs in SLES, so it can't be that experimental or unstable
18 any more.
19
20
21 --
22 Neil Bothwick
23
24 A real programmer never documents his code.
25 It was hard to make, it should be hard to read

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3? Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@××××××××××××××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3? Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net>