| 1 |
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 04:52 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> What is the end-result without the lines? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
localmount fails at mounting /var /home and /tmp (while swap gets |
| 8 |
mounted which is *also* on LVM because lvm starts up before the swap |
| 9 |
gets activated). |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I use an older version still. |
| 13 |
> In rc.conf, I only set the "need" lines for init-scripts I created myself. |
| 14 |
> I never used the other lines. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I still have no idea why the sequence is messed up. I tried reverting to |
| 18 |
0.10.5, but that didn't help either. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> Do you have /usr on / ? Or on a seperate partition? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
/usr is not a separate partition, it's on the same partition as root. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> Which metadata version did you use for the software raid setup? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Can you add "mdadm" to the boot-runlevel? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is |
| 31 |
kernel based autodetect. |
| 32 |
Earlier I went by the raid guide on gentoo.org, but I configured it to |
| 33 |
use kernel based autodetect. |
| 34 |
mdadm anyway was reporting nothing detected (when added to boot |
| 35 |
runlevel) so it's not there in the boot runlevel. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Moreover, since lvm starts up successfully, it doesn't seem to be an |
| 38 |
issue because of mdadm. It's just the sequence that's messed up. :S |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
Nilesh Govindarajan |
| 42 |
http://nileshgr.com |
Archives