Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: problem with v86d
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:22:54
Message-Id: ln9s77$ebq$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: problem with v86d by covici@ccs.covici.com
1 On 11/06/14 17:49, covici@××××××××××.com wrote:
2 > Thanks. I have a fairly old kernel for other reasons and I installed
3 > v86d in 2011 and it has not changed since. I use udesafb because I
4 > want a frame buffer so I can get a lot more than 80x25 in a virtual
5 > console. Iget 64x160. I also need something which will net the nvidia
6 > driver work since this is the card I have. I did try the noveau driver,
7 > but it did not give me as large of a screen and nvidia driver did not
8 > like that driver. I can't remember what it complained about, but it
9 > means no X at all.
10
11 If you're not booting in EFI mode, then you can use vesafb instead. This
12 doesn't require v86d and doesn't even require an initrd.
13
14 uvesafb is mostly for non-PC or generally platforms where a BIOS is not
15 available (EFI on a PC also lacks BIOS), and it achieves that through
16 v86d. vesafb uses the BIOS directly, so v86d is not needed.

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: problem with v86d James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>