Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: problem with v86d
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 20:10:54
Message-Id: loom.20140611T201535-954@post.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: problem with v86d by Nikos Chantziaras
1 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc <at> gmail.com> writes:
2
3
4 > > like that driver. I can't remember what it complained about, but it
5 > > means no X at all.
6 >
7 > If you're not booting in EFI mode, then you can use vesafb instead. This
8 > doesn't require v86d and doesn't even require an initrd.
9 >
10 > uvesafb is mostly for non-PC or generally platforms where a BIOS is not
11 > available (EFI on a PC also lacks BIOS), and it achieves that through
12 > v86d. vesafb uses the BIOS directly, so v86d is not needed.
13
14 Spock is Michał Januszewski
15
16 A physics type with keen interests in chipsets; loads of Frame
17 Buffer info on his blog. He'd be a keen resource for you. Seems
18 he has vanished from the gentoo scene?
19
20 spock@g.o
21
22 http://mjanusz.wordpress.com/
23
24 http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XSjXVbQAAAAJ&hl=en
25
26 http://mjanusz.github.io/homepage/
27
28 I'd rather think he's one of those "really sharp" but hidden
29 physics folks, who very much likes Gentoo and privacy.
30
31
32 hth,
33 James

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: problem with v86d covici@××××××××××.com