1 |
Thanks for your response Michael... |
2 |
|
3 |
On 2012-01-01 11:51 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: |
5 |
> While I haven't played with XenServer, I have played with its |
6 |
> open-source clone, XCP, and was very annoyed by it. I'd rather run a |
7 |
> Gentoo dom0. |
8 |
|
9 |
I just thought that running a bare metal hyperviser would be more |
10 |
stable/reliable, and running it on a thumb drive would be much more |
11 |
convenient. |
12 |
|
13 |
>> First - I want to use a bare metal hypervisor that supports the |
14 |
>> following: |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> 1. Can be installed on a USB FLASH drive (I have some Dell |
17 |
>> Poweredge 2970 servers with the internal USB slot for just this |
18 |
>> purpose), and |
19 |
|
20 |
> I don't think I've heard of anyone doing this, but I don't see why |
21 |
> it'd be a problem. |
22 |
|
23 |
Definitely not a problem for XenServer (although v6 isn't officially |
24 |
supported on a thumb drive yet), so I was mainly wondering about Xen |
25 |
itself... |
26 |
|
27 |
>> 2. Fully supports both Windows Server 2008 (our Domain Controller), |
28 |
>> and Gentoo Linux (our mail and web servers). |
29 |
|
30 |
> The xen supports hvm, where it emulates hardware; in a full hvm VM, |
31 |
> *any* operating system comfortable on x86 should run. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> There's also paravirtualization, which is faster, and is likely what |
34 |
> you're thinking of wrt 'bare metal'. Signed drivers for paravirt |
35 |
> mode for hardware (such as your network, disk or system clock) are |
36 |
> available for current versions of Windows. |
37 |
|
38 |
Yes, PV is what I was thinking of, thanks - and apparently this wouldn't |
39 |
be a problem with gentoo either? |
40 |
|
41 |
>> I can't seem to find an ebuild for the xenserver tools, and when |
42 |
>> looking found out about Xen (I had thought that it went away a long |
43 |
>> time ago)... |
44 |
|
45 |
> * app-emulation/xen-tools |
46 |
> Available versions: 3.4.2-r3 ~3.4.2-r5 ~4.1.1-r5 4.1.1-r6 |
47 |
> ~4.1.2-r2!t {acm api custom-cflags debug doc flask hvm pygrub qemu |
48 |
> screen xend} |
49 |
> Homepage: http://xen.org/ |
50 |
> Description: Xend daemon and tools |
51 |
|
52 |
Hmm... so will these tools work with XenServer? Or are they just for Xen? |
53 |
|
54 |
Also, I ran across an article on the gentoo wiki that said that the VM |
55 |
images for Xen and XenServer are NOT compatible, which I find odd if |
56 |
XenServer is just Xen with some additional tools provided by Citrix. |
57 |
|
58 |
The article also said that the single biggest advantage of XenServer is |
59 |
the amount of time required to get something up and running - minutes |
60 |
for XenServer, compared to days for Xen - is this dated info, or still true? |
61 |
|
62 |
> * sec-policy/selinux-xen |
63 |
> Available versions: [M]2.20110726 |
64 |
> Homepage: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/selinux/ |
65 |
> Description: SELinux policy for xen |
66 |
> |
67 |
> * sys-kernel/xen-sources |
68 |
> Available versions: |
69 |
> (2.6.18-r12) 2.6.18-r12!b!s |
70 |
> (2.6.34-r3) ~2.6.34-r3!b!s |
71 |
> (2.6.34-r4) ~2.6.34-r4!b!s |
72 |
> (2.6.38) ~2.6.38!b!s |
73 |
> {build deblob symlink} |
74 |
> Homepage: http://xen.org/ |
75 |
> Description: Full sources for a dom0/domU Linux kernel to |
76 |
> run under Xen |
77 |
|
78 |
I though that xen-sources were no longer needed as of kernel 2.6.33+? |
79 |
|
80 |
Thanks again Michael, |
81 |
|
82 |
Charles |