1 |
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Grant Edwards |
2 |
<grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On 2011-09-05, Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> wrote: |
4 |
>> Graham Murray wonders: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> Has the libreoffice ebuild suddenly developed stability problems? Today |
7 |
>>> is the 4th time in five days that my daily ~x86 emerge uD world has |
8 |
>>> rebuilt libreoffice. On 1st Sept it was because of a use flag change, |
9 |
>>> then the next day a new version was put in the tree, then there was an |
10 |
>>> -r1 release and today there is yet another use flag change. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> Same here on ~amd64. The last change is that cups is mandatory now, |
13 |
> |
14 |
> What?? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> So if I don't have a printer, and have no intention of printing |
17 |
> anything from this system, libreoffice requires that I install Cups? |
18 |
|
19 |
In my puny laptop, CUPS takes 1 min to compile, the source code is 4.4 |
20 |
Mb and the installed binaries are 9.3 Mb. It seems to be updated at |
21 |
the rate of once a month, roughly. |
22 |
|
23 |
I have never configured CUPS, *ever*, and it always just works when I |
24 |
connect to a new network. The printers just appear in the print |
25 |
dialog, and it always works. It always remembers my last selected |
26 |
options. |
27 |
|
28 |
To me it seems a rather sane default to always require the most used |
29 |
printing system in an office suite. |
30 |
|
31 |
> Sounds like it's time to switch back to OOo. |
32 |
|
33 |
It would not surprise me that they will switch to mandatory CUPS in |
34 |
the future. It just happened before in LO because they develop new |
35 |
features faster, I believe. |
36 |
|
37 |
Regards. |
38 |
-- |
39 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
40 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
41 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |