| 1 |
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 08 February 2010 01:27:33 Mark Knecht wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> sorry to have forgotten is but simply do |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> df |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> and see what it says is mounted |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> $ df |
| 11 |
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on |
| 12 |
> rootfs 60G 25G 32G 44% / |
| 13 |
> /dev/root 60G 25G 32G 44% / |
| 14 |
> rc-svcdir 1.0M 108K 916K 11% /lib64/rc/init.d |
| 15 |
> udev 10M 144K 9.9M 2% /dev |
| 16 |
> shm 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /dev/shm |
| 17 |
> /dev/sda6 40G 6.4G 32G 17% /home |
| 18 |
> /dev/sda7 61G 23G 36G 39% /home/prh/common |
| 19 |
> tmpfs 9.0G 1.8M 9.0G 1% /tmp |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Now, ever since I upgraded to openrc (by setting ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64 |
| 22 |
> when I installed this system) my root partition has not been shown as a |
| 23 |
> physical partition. I decided to let it go for the time being. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> -- |
| 26 |
> Rgds |
| 27 |
> Peter. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Is this some sort of LVM thing creeping in? I don't use it but I see |
| 32 |
signs of it starting to show up on my systems like something is making |
| 33 |
it come in with new profiles or something. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I don't know how LVM works but I assume that rootfs and /dev/root have |
| 36 |
something to do with your main file system? I rebuilt new hardware for |
| 37 |
my dad yesterday using the default sda1/2/3 setup from the Gentoo |
| 38 |
AMD64 Install Guide and I see the following: |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
gandalf ~ # df |
| 41 |
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on |
| 42 |
/dev/sda3 103212320 5041116 92928324 6% / |
| 43 |
udev 10240 164 10076 2% /dev |
| 44 |
shm 1925772 0 1925772 0% /dev/shm |
| 45 |
gandalf ~ # cat /proc/partitions |
| 46 |
major minor #blocks name |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
8 0 976762584 sda |
| 49 |
8 1 102343 sda1 |
| 50 |
8 2 8388608 sda2 |
| 51 |
8 3 104857600 sda3 |
| 52 |
gandalf ~ # |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
Did you intend to have 3 100MB partitions at the start of your drive |
| 55 |
and then everything else inside of an extended partition? It's not |
| 56 |
wrong - it was just unexpected for me. |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
Is yours a 1-Terabyte drive? |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
[QUOTE] |
| 61 |
$ cat /proc/partitions |
| 62 |
major minor #blocks name |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
8 0 976762584 sda |
| 65 |
8 1 112423 sda1 |
| 66 |
8 2 112455 sda2 |
| 67 |
8 3 104422 sda3 |
| 68 |
8 4 1 sda4 |
| 69 |
8 5 62918509 sda5 |
| 70 |
8 6 41945683 sda6 |
| 71 |
8 7 64685691 sda7 |
| 72 |
8 8 20000925 sda8 |
| 73 |
8 9 10000431 sda9 |
| 74 |
8 10 10490413 sda10 |
| 75 |
8 11 10482381 sda11 |
| 76 |
8 12 20980858 sda12 |
| 77 |
8 13 10490413 sda13 |
| 78 |
[/QUOTE] |
Archives