| 1 |
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:14 +0200, Richard Fish wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jules Colding wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> >I tried the aforementioned script just to see if that picked up |
| 5 |
> >anything. Lo and behold... it segfaulted in mkdir. I am beginning to |
| 6 |
> >suspect a subtle reiserfs (mounted with noatime and notail) bug as I am |
| 7 |
> >only seeing segfaults with mkdir and only under high load. There was |
| 8 |
> >something in /var/log/messages as well. Script, output, log and info |
| 9 |
> >below. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Um, what version of reiserfs are we talking about here? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Whatever is in gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r6. dmesg tells me that it is |
| 17 |
format "3.6". |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> I recall |
| 21 |
> reading recently on lkml (or maybe it was somewhere else..) reports that |
| 22 |
> reiser4 has known and serious problems on non-x86 platforms, and maybe |
| 23 |
> that extends to AMD64 as well.... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Yes, reiser4 is not quite stable yet. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> If you are using the stable reiser3.6 (the only option available in the |
| 28 |
> gentoo-sources or vanilla-sources), well, I would be very surprised if |
| 29 |
> this was a bug there, because noatime and notail are very common options |
| 30 |
> and it is a very popular filesystem. I would put my money on bad ram or |
| 31 |
> memory timings in this case. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I would expect other things to fail too if it was bad RAM or memory |
| 34 |
timings, right? The only failure scenario is mkdir under high load which |
| 35 |
to me points towards s specific problem area in the code. This is just |
| 36 |
an unqualified guess, naturally... |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
jules |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives